American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question

Released February 10, 2015

  1. 1

    Don’t do a needle electromyography (EMG) test for isolated neck or back pain after a motor vehicle accident, as a needle EMG is unlikely to be helpful.

    Needle EMG for neck pain without arm pain, arm tingling, arm weakness, or arm numbness does not improve outcomes but does increase costs. The same is true of needle EMG for back pain without lower limb pain, lower limb tingling, lower limb weakness, or lower limb numbness. Neck and back pain are both common reasons for physician visits.

  2. 2

    Don’t perform dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for a pinched nerve in the neck or back, as they are an unproven diagnostic procedure.

    Although techniques such as needle EMG and nerve conduction studies can be helpful to diagnose pinched nerve in the neck (cervical radiculopathy) or back (lumbar radiculopathy), dermatomal SEP is of unproven worth for this purpose but does increase costs. There are a number of causes of neck, shoulder, and upper limb pain besides cervical radiculopathy. There are also a number of causes of back, hip, thigh, and lower limb pain besides lumbar radiculopathy.

  3. 3

    Don’t do a four limb needle EMG/nerve conduction study (NCS) testing for neck and back pain after trauma.

    Although techniques such as needle EMG and NCS can be helpful to diagnose pinched nerve in the neck or back (cervical or lumbar radiculopathy), four limb needle EMG/NCS is not needed and is not considered appropriate testing but does increase costs. Four limb needle EMG/NCS is, however, rarely needed to evaluate patients for ALS, polyradiculoneuropathy, or multiple mononeuropathies.

  4. 4

    Don’t do nerve conduction studies without also doing a needle EMG for testing for radiculopathy, a pinched nerve in the neck or back.

    For diagnosis of a pinched nerve in the neck or back, nerve conduction studies alone cannot make the diagnosis. Needle EMG is necessary to identify and characterize the disease process.

  5. 5

    Don’t do a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the spine or brain for patients with only peripheral neuropathy (without signs or symptoms suggesting a brain or spine disorder).

    Because the vast majority of people with peripheral neuropathy (also called polyneuropathy) have the longest nerves of the body primarily affected (mostly in the toes and feet but sometimes also in the hands), there is essentially no justification for MRI imaging of the brain or spine in these cases.

These items are provided solely for informational purposes and are not intended as a substitute for consultation with a medical professional. Patients with any specific questions about the items on this list or their individual situation should consult their physician.

The American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) was founded in 1953. We are a nonprofit membership association dedicated to the advancement of neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and electrodiagnostic medicine. Our nearly 4,500 members, neurologists and physiatrists and other allied health professionals and researchers, are working to improve the quality of medical care provided to patients with muscle and nerve disorders. To learn more about the AANEM, visit www.aanem.org.

How This List Was Created

The Professional Practice Committee (PPC) of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) developed this list of recommendations. The PPC includes both neurologists and physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) physicians who come from varying practice settings and also includes the AANEM’s representatives to the American Medical Association (AMA) Current Procedural Terminology Panel and Relative Value Update Committee. The PPC members identified areas to be included on this list based on the greatest potential for overuse/misuse, quality improvement and availability of strong evidence-based research/support in the literature. The committee’s recommendations were discussed at an AANEM Board meeting that included chairs from AANEM committees. The PPC reviewed the feedback from this group and voted on the final Top Five recommendations. These were then approved by the AANEM Board of Directors.

AANEM’s disclosure and conflict of interest policy can be found at www.aanem.org.

Sources

  1. Braddom RL, Spitz L, Rivner MH. Frequency of radiculopathies in motor vehicle accidents. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Apr;39: 545-7.

    Ovadia D, Steinberg EL, Nissan MN, Dekel S. Whiplash injury – a retrospective study on patients seeking compensation. Injury. 2002 Sep;33(7): 569-73.

    Steinberg EL, Ovadia D, Nissan M, Menahem A, Dekel S. Whiplash injury: is there a role for electromyography studies? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Feb;125(1):46-50.

    Suri P, Hunter DJ, Jouve C, Hartigan C, Limke J, Pena E, Swaim B, Li L, Rainville J. Inciting events associated with lumbar disc herniation. Spine Journal. 2010 may;10:388-95.

  2. American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee. Neurology. 1997 Oct;49(4):1127-30.

    Rodriguez, AA, Kanis L, Rodriquez AA, Lane D. Somatosensory evoked potentials from dermatomal stimulation as an indicator of L5 and S1 radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1987 Jun;68(6):366-8.

    Yazicioglu K, Ozgül A, Kalyon TA, Gündüz S, Arpacioğlu O, Bilgiç F. The diagnostic value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbrosacral disc herniations: a critical approach. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr-May;39(3): 175-81.

  3. Braddom RL, Spitz L, Rivner MH. Frequency of radiculopathies in motor vehicle accidents. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Apr;39: 545-7.

    Ovadia D, Steinberg EL, Nissan MN, Dekel S. Whiplash injury – a retrospective study on patients seeking compensation. Injury. 2002 Sep;33(7): 569-73.

    Steinberg EL, Ovadia D, Nissan M, Menahem A, Dekel S. Whiplash injury: is there a role for electromyography studies? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Feb;125(1):46-50.

  4. Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Pezzin LE, Stephens RT, Shannon S. Identifying lumbrosacral radiculopathies: an optimal electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000Nov-Dec;79(6):496-503.

    Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Pezzin LE, Stephens RT, Shannon S. Identification of cervical radiculopathies: optimizing the electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Feb;80(2):84-91.

  5. England, JD Gronseth GS, Franklin G, Carter GT, Kinsella LJ, Cohen JA, Asbury AK, Szigeti K, Lupski JR, Latov N, Lewis RA, Low PA, Fisher MA, Herrmann DN, Howard JF Jr, Lauria G, Miller RG, Polydefkis M, Sumner AJ; American Academy of Neurology. Practice Parameter: evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 2009 Jan 13;72(2):185-92.