American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Ten Things Physicians and Patients Should Question

Released February 10, 2015 (Items 1 – 5); July 31, 2017 (Items 6 – 10). #3 updated July 12, 2018. #3 removed and #11 added September 1, 2022

  1. 1

    Don’t do a needle electromyography (EMG) test for isolated neck or back pain after a motor vehicle accident, as a needle EMG is unlikely to be helpful.

    Needle EMG for neck pain without arm pain, arm tingling, arm weakness, or arm numbness does not improve outcomes but does increase costs. The same is true of needle EMG for back pain without lower limb pain, lower limb tingling, lower limb weakness, or lower limb numbness. Neck and back pain are both common reasons for physician visits.

  2. 2

    Don’t perform dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for a pinched nerve in the neck or back, as they are an unproven diagnostic procedure.

    Although techniques such as needle EMG and nerve conduction studies can be helpful to diagnose pinched nerve in the neck (cervical radiculopathy) or back (lumbar radiculopathy), dermatomal SEP is of unproven worth for this purpose but does increase costs. There are a number of causes of neck, shoulder, and upper limb pain besides cervical radiculopathy. There are also a number of causes of back, hip, thigh, and lower limb pain besides lumbar radiculopathy.

  3. 3

  4. 4

    Don’t do nerve conduction studies without also doing a needle EMG for testing for radiculopathy, a pinched nerve in the neck or back.

    For diagnosis of a pinched nerve in the neck or back, nerve conduction studies alone cannot make the diagnosis. Needle EMG is necessary to identify and characterize the disease process.

  5. 5

    Don’t do a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the spine or brain for patients with only peripheral neuropathy (without signs or symptoms suggesting a brain or spine disorder).

    Because the vast majority of people with peripheral neuropathy (also called polyneuropathy) have the longest nerves of the body primarily affected (mostly in the toes and feet but sometimes also in the hands), there is essentially no justification for MRI imaging of the brain or spine in these cases.

  6. 6

    Don’t use intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of idiopathic length dependent axonal polyneuropathy.

    IVIG is an expensive therapy with side effects that may include severe allergic reactions, headaches and blood clots. It is recommended for use in Guillain-Barre Syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy, but not other polyneuropathies.

  7. 7

    Don’t routinely use B vitamin supplements for the treatment of polyneuropathy or neuropathic pain unless a deficiency exists.

    There is no indication for supplementing with B vitamins in patients with polyneuropathy unless a deficiency has been detected or is highly likely secondary to other medical factors (e.g., gastric bypass surgery). In addition to being an unnecessary expense, excessive vitamin B-6 can lead to toxicity and cause worsening neuropathy.

  8. 8

    Don’t perform nerve conduction studies or electromyography for muscle pain in the absence of other abnormalities on examination or laboratory testing.

    Muscle pain or myalgias are common. The likelihood of finding a muscle disease in an individual with muscle pain who has a normal neurologic exam and laboratory tests is quite low.

  9. 9

    Don’t choose opioids or narcotics as the first choice of treatment for neuropathic pain.

    Opioids and narcotics include drugs such as hydrocodone, oxycodone, fentanyl and others. Risks related to the use of these drugs include uncontrollable sleepiness and slow or stopped breathing. They are a leading cause of addiction and avoidable death. Opioids may be less risky when used for a short time after some surgeries or when used for pain related to deadly cancers. There are many effective, safer options for neuropathic pain.

  10. 10

    Don’t have genetic testing for nerve and muscle diseases prior to having a discussion with your physician or a genetics professional.

    Genetic testing is now widely available and can be ordered directly by patients from home. Due to the potential implications of test results and the complexity of testing, patients are advised to speak with their physician or genetic counselor prior to having testing performed. Pre-testing counseling will help patients select appropriate testing, understand the limitations of testing, potential out-of-pocket costs and the effect that positive test results may have on the patient and their family.

  11. 11

    Don’t use neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) to evaluate the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome.

    While NMUS may be used as a reasonable alternative to electrodiagnostic evaluation (nerve conduction studies and electromyography) for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in some patients, its ability to determine severity is uncertain.

These items are provided solely for informational purposes and are not intended as a substitute for consultation with a medical professional. Patients with any specific questions about the items on this list or their individual situation should consult their physician.

The American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) was founded in 1953. We are a nonprofit membership association dedicated to the advancement of neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and electrodiagnostic medicine. Our nearly 4,500 members, neurologists and physiatrists and other allied health professionals and researchers, are working to improve the quality of medical care provided to patients with muscle and nerve disorders. To learn more about the AANEM, visit

How This List Was Created

The Professional Practice Committee (PPC) of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) developed this list of recommendations. The PPC includes both neurologists and physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) physicians who come from varying practice settings and also includes the AANEM’s representatives to the American Medical Association (AMA) Current Procedural Terminology Panel and Relative Value Update Committee. The PPC members identified areas to be included on this list based on the greatest potential for overuse/misuse, quality improvement and availability of strong evidence-based research/support in the literature. The committee’s recommendations were discussed at an AANEM Board meeting that included chairs from AANEM committees. The PPC reviewed the feedback from this group and voted on the final Top Ten recommendations. These were then approved by the AANEM Board of Directors.

AANEM’s disclosure and conflict of interest policy can be found at


  1. Braddom RL, Spitz L, Rivner MH. Frequency of radiculopathies in motor vehicle accidents. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Apr;39: 545-7.

    Ovadia D, Steinberg EL, Nissan MN, Dekel S. Whiplash injury – a retrospective study on patients seeking compensation. Injury. 2002 Sep;33(7): 569-73.

    Steinberg EL, Ovadia D, Nissan M, Menahem A, Dekel S. Whiplash injury: is there a role for electromyography studies? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Feb;125(1):46-50.

    Suri P, Hunter DJ, Jouve C, Hartigan C, Limke J, Pena E, Swaim B, Li L, Rainville J. Inciting events associated with lumbar disc herniation. Spine Journal. 2010 may;10:388-95.

  2. American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee. Neurology. 1997 Oct;49(4):1127-30.

    Rodriguez, AA, Kanis L, Rodriquez AA, Lane D. Somatosensory evoked potentials from dermatomal stimulation as an indicator of L5 and S1 radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1987 Jun;68(6):366-8.

    Yazicioglu K, Ozgül A, Kalyon TA, Gündüz S, Arpacioğlu O, Bilgiç F. The diagnostic value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbrosacral disc herniations: a critical approach. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr-May;39(3): 175-81.

  3. Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Pezzin LE, Stephens RT, Shannon S. Identifying lumbrosacral radiculopathies: an optimal electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000Nov-Dec;79(6):496-503.

    Dillingham TR, Lauder TD, Andary M, Kumar S, Pezzin LE, Stephens RT, Shannon S. Identification of cervical radiculopathies: optimizing the electromyographic screen. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Feb;80(2):84-91.

  4. England, JD Gronseth GS, Franklin G, Carter GT, Kinsella LJ, Cohen JA, Asbury AK, Szigeti K, Lupski JR, Latov N, Lewis RA, Low PA, Fisher MA, Herrmann DN, Howard JF Jr, Lauria G, Miller RG, Polydefkis M, Sumner AJ; American Academy of Neurology. Practice Parameter: evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 2009 Jan 13;72(2):185-92.

  5. Patwa et al. Neurology. 2012 Mar 27;78(13): 1009-15.

    Feasby et al. Transfus Med Rev. 2007 Apr;21(2 Supp 1): S57-107.

    Donofrio PD et al. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Nov;40(5):890-900. doi: 10.1002/mus.21433.

  6. Bril V et al. Neurology. 2011 May 17;76(20):1758-65.

    Kulkantrakorn K. Neurol Sci. 2014 Nov;35(11):1827-30.

    Pluijims et al. Pain Pract. 2011 Mar-Apr;11(2):191-8.

  7. Echaniz-Laguna, A, Chanson, J. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Aug;54(2):321-324.

  8. Scholten PM, Harden RN. Assessing and Treating Patients With Neuropathic Pain. PM R. 2015;7(11Suppl):S257-69.

  9. AANEM Position Statement. The Utility of Genetic Testing in Neuromuscular Disease: A Consensus from the AANEM on the Clinical Usefulness of Genetic Testing in the Diagnosis of Neuromuscular Disease. April 2016.

    ACMG Board of Directors. Genet Med. 2015, Dec; 18:207-208, advance online publication, Dec 17, 2015; doi:10.1038/gim.2015.190.

  10. Cartwright MS, Hobson-Webb LD, Boon AJ, Alter KE, Hunt CH, Flores VH, Werner RA, Shook SJ, Thomas TD, Primack SJ, Walker FO; American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline: neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Aug;46(2):287-93. doi: 10.1002/mus.23389. PMID: 22806381.

    Pelosi L, Arányi Z, Beekman R, Bland J, Coraci D, Hobson-Webb LD, Padua L, Podnar S, Simon N, van Alfen N, Verhamme C, Visser L, Walker FO, Shik Yoon J, Cartwright MS. Expert consensus on the combined investigation of carpal tunnel syndrome with electrodiagnostic tests and neuromuscular ultrasound. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Mar;135:107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Jan 6. PMID: 35074720

    Martikkala L, Himanen SL, Virtanen K, Mäkelä K. The Neurophysiological Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Cannot Be Predicted by Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area and Wrist-to-Forearm Ratio. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul 1;38(4):312-316. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000696. PMID: 32224714.